AMD FX-8350
Select processor 2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD FX-8350 - specifications and benchmarks

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2012
AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8350

The AMD FX-8350 technical specifications and performance benchmarks are detailed on this page. The release date is Q4/2012. AMD FX-8350 supports the installation of AM3+ socket on the motherboard. The number of cores is 8 with the base clock speed of 4.00 GHz. Maximum capacity and type of RAM supported are . TDP is 125 W.
Performance tests
Real tests AMD FX-8350
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
CPU generation and family

description AMD FX-8350

  • Name
    AMD FX-8350
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD FX
  • Generation
    2
  • CPU group
    AMD FX-8000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

  • Frequency
    4.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.20 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8
  • Turbo (8 Cores)
    4.10 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No
  • Overclocking
    Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal
Internal Graphics

  • GPU name
    no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo
Hardware codec support

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No
  • h264
    No
  • VP9
    No
  • VP8
    No
  • AV1
    No
  • AVC
    No
  • VC-1
    No
  • JPEG
    No
Memory & PCIe

  • ECC
    Yes
  • Memory channels
    2
Encryption

  • AES-NI
    Yes
Thermal Management

  • TDP (PL1)
    125 W
Technical details

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Vishera (Bulldozer)
  • Technology
    32 nm
  • Socket
    AM3+
  • Release date
    Q4/2012
Devices using this processor

  • Used in
    Unknown
Rate the processor
AMD FX-8350
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons