AMD Phenom II X4 975
Select processor 2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Phenom II X4 975 - specifications and benchmarks

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2011
AMD Phenom II X4 975

AMD Phenom II X4 975

The AMD Phenom II X4 975 technical specifications and performance benchmarks are detailed on this page. The release date is Q1/2011. AMD Phenom II X4 975 supports the installation of AM3 socket on the motherboard. The number of cores is 4 with the base clock speed of 3.60 GHz. Maximum capacity and type of RAM supported are DDR2-1066. TDP is 125 W.
Performance tests
Real tests AMD Phenom II X4 975
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
CPU generation and family

description AMD Phenom II X4 975

  • Name
    AMD Phenom II X4 975
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Phenom II
  • Generation
    4
  • CPU group
    AMD Phenom II - 800/900
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

  • Frequency
    3.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No
  • Overclocking
    Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal
Internal Graphics

  • GPU name
    no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo
Hardware codec support

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No
  • h264
    No
  • VP9
    No
  • VP8
    No
  • AV1
    No
  • AVC
    No
  • VC-1
    No
  • JPEG
    No
Memory & PCIe

  • Memory type
    DDR2-1066
  • ECC
    No
  • Memory channels
    2
Encryption

  • AES-NI
    No
Thermal Management

  • TDP (PL1)
    125 W
Technical details

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a
  • L3-Cache
    6.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Deneb (K10)
  • Technology
    45 nm
  • Socket
    AM3
  • Release date
    Q1/2011
Devices using this processor

  • Used in
    Unknown
Rate the processor
AMD Phenom II X4 975
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons