Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Intel GMA 600
Apple M1 Pro (14 Core)

Intel GMA 600 与 Apple M1 Pro (14 Core)

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2010

Intel GMA 600 显卡与 Apple M1 Pro (14 Core) 显卡的规格和基准比较。 Intel GMA 600 运行速度为 0.400 GHz,内存为 0 GB ,而显卡 Intel GMA 600 运行速度为 0.400 GHz,内存为 0 GB 。 权重不同,-- 对 --。第一个显卡的 TDP 是 --,第二个是 --。比较基准测试结果,找出哪个显卡更好。

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel GMA 600
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Apple M1 Pro (14 Core)
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.300 GHz left arrow 0.400 GHz
    Around 69% better clock speed
  • More memory
    32 GB left arrow 0 GB
    100% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests Intel GMA 600 vs Apple M1 Pro (14 Core)
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel GMA 600 Intel GMA 600
Apple M1 Pro (14 Core) Apple M1 Pro (14 Core)
GPU

gpu Intel GMA 600 item

  • Based on
    Intel GMA 600 left arrow Apple M1 Pro (14 Core)
  • GPU Chip
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 224
  • Shader
    0 left arrow 1792
Memory
  • Memory Size
    0 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • Memory Clock
    0.000 GHz left arrow 0.000 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    0 Gbps left arrow 0 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    0 GB/s left arrow 0 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    0 bit left arrow 0 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    0.400 GHz left arrow 1.300 GHz
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
Thermal Design
Cooler & Fans
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    0 left arrow 3
Featureset
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Release date
    Q2/2010 left arrow Q3/2021
  • Structure size
    45 nm left arrow 5 nm
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons