Select processor 1
Select processor 2
AMD Radeon R6E
AMD Radeon HD 6320

AMD Radeon R6E 与 AMD Radeon HD 6320

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
2015

AMD Radeon R6E 显卡与 AMD Radeon HD 6320 显卡的规格和基准比较。 AMD Radeon R6E 运行速度为 0.760 GHz,内存为 0 GB ,而显卡 AMD Radeon R6E 运行速度为 0.760 GHz,内存为 0 GB 。 权重不同,-- 对 --。第一个显卡的 TDP 是 --,第二个是 --。比较基准测试结果,找出哪个显卡更好。

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD Radeon R6E
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    0.760 GHz left arrow 0.510 GHz
    Around 33% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Report a bug
  • More memory
    1 GB left arrow 0 GB
    100% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests AMD Radeon R6E vs AMD Radeon HD 6320
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD Radeon R6E AMD Radeon R6E
AMD Radeon HD 6320 AMD Radeon HD 6320
GPU

gpu AMD Radeon R6E item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon R6E left arrow AMD Radeon HD 6320
  • GPU Chip
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 1
  • Shader
    256 left arrow 80
Memory
  • Memory Size
    0 GB left arrow 1 GB
  • Memory Clock
    0.000 GHz left arrow 0.000 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    0 Gbps left arrow 0 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    0 GB/s left arrow 0 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    0 bit left arrow 0 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    0.760 GHz left arrow 0.510 GHz
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
Thermal Design
Cooler & Fans
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • HDCP-Version
    0 left arrow --
Featureset
  • DirectX
    0 left arrow 11
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Release date
    2015 left arrow Q4/2010
  • Structure size
    0 nm left arrow 40 nm
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons