Select processor 1
Select processor 2
XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 980 Ti Xtreme Gaming

Comparando XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 980 Ti Xtreme Gaming

Comparação da placa de vídeo XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming versus placa de vídeo GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 980 Ti Xtreme Gaming por especificações e benchmarks. XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming roda na velocidade base de 1.850 GHz+ 9 % e tem 16 GB de memória GDDR6, enquanto a placa de vídeo GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 980 Ti Xtreme Gaming roda na velocidade base de 1.850 GHz+ 9 % e tem 6 GB de memória GDDR5. O peso é diferente, -- vs --. O TDP da primeira placa de vídeo é 250 W e a segunda é 250 W . Compare os resultados do benchmark para descobrir qual placa de vídeo é melhor.

XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming
Differences
Reasons to consider
XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.850 GHz+ 9 % left arrow 1.241 GHz+ 24 %
    Around 33% better clock speed
  • More memory
    16 GB left arrow 6 GB
    63% more memory
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 980 Ti Xtreme Gaming
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 980 Ti Xtreme Gaming
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 980 Ti Xtreme Gaming GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 980 Ti Xtreme Gaming
GPU

gpu XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6800 Black Gaming item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6800 left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 left arrow GM200-310-A1 (Maxwell 2.0)
  • Execution units
    60 left arrow 22
  • Shader
    3840 left arrow 2816
  • Render Output Units
    96 left arrow 96
  • Texture Units
    240 left arrow 176
Memory
  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 6 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 7.2 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 346 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.850 GHz+ 9 % left arrow 1.241 GHz+ 24 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.190 GHz+ 4 % left arrow 1.342 GHz+ 25 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.980 GHz+ 9 % left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • TDP (up)
    285 W left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 92 \xc2\xb0C
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 105 mm left arrow 3 x 90 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    1 x 90 mm left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    36 dB left arrow --
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.2
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 4096x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    Addressable LED left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    340 mm left arrow 287 mm
  • Height
    138 mm left arrow 134 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 51 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3 x 16
  • Release date
    Q4/2020 left arrow Q4/2015
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Part-no
    RX-68XLALBD9 left arrow GV-N98TXTREME-6GD
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons