Select processor 1
Select processor 2
PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT
XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming

Comparando XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming vs PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2021

Comparação da placa de vídeo XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming versus placa de vídeo PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT por especificações e benchmarks. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming roda na velocidade base de 1.925 GHz+ 5 % e tem 16 GB de memória GDDR6, enquanto a placa de vídeo PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT roda na velocidade base de 1.925 GHz+ 5 % e tem 16 GB de memória GDDR6. O peso é diferente, 1817 g vs --. O TDP da primeira placa de vídeo é 300 W e a segunda é 300 W . Compare os resultados do benchmark para descobrir qual placa de vídeo é melhor.

XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming
Differences
Reasons to consider
PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.925 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.825 GHz
    Around 5% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT
XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming
GPU

gpu PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 left arrow Navi 21 XT
  • Execution units
    80 left arrow 72
  • Shader
    5120 left arrow 4608
  • Render Output Units
    128 left arrow 128
  • Texture Units
    320 left arrow 288
Memory
  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.825 GHz left arrow 1.925 GHz+ 5 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.365 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 2.360 GHz+ 5 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.135 GHz+ 6 % left arrow 2.110 GHz+ 5 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    300 W left arrow 300 W
  • TDP (up)
    345 W left arrow 345 W
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 96 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    3 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Water cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow 2 x 105 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow 1 x 90 mm
  • Noise (Load)
    0 dB left arrow 35-36 dB
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    2x DP v1.4a left arrow 2x DP v1.4a
  • USB-C Ports
    1 left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    Addressable LED left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
Dimensions
  • Length
    266 mm left arrow 340 mm
  • Height
    162 mm left arrow 138 mm
  • Width
    42 mm left arrow 54 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 1817 g
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2021 left arrow Q1/2021
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 799 $
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    AXRX 6900XT 16GBD6-W2DHC/OC left arrow RX-68XTACBD9
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons