Select processor 1
Select processor 2
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio Plus 16G
XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming

Comparando XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming vs MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio Plus 16G

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2022

Comparação da placa de vídeo XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming versus placa de vídeo MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio Plus 16G por especificações e benchmarks. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming roda na velocidade base de 1.925 GHz+ 5 % e tem 16 GB de memória GDDR6, enquanto a placa de vídeo MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio Plus 16G roda na velocidade base de 1.925 GHz+ 5 % e tem 16 GB de memória GDDR6. O peso é diferente, -- vs 1564 g. O TDP da primeira placa de vídeo é 300 W e a segunda é 300 W . Compare os resultados do benchmark para descobrir qual placa de vídeo é melhor.

XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming
Differences
Reasons to consider
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio Plus 16G
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.925 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.825 GHz
    Around 5% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio Plus 16G MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio Plus 16G
XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming
GPU

gpu MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio Plus 16G item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 XT left arrow Navi 21
  • Execution units
    72 left arrow 80
  • Shader
    4608 left arrow 5120
  • Render Output Units
    128 left arrow 128
  • Texture Units
    288 left arrow 320
Memory
  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    16 Gbps left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.825 GHz left arrow 1.925 GHz+ 5 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.250 GHz left arrow 2.340 GHz+ 4 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.015 GHz left arrow 2.105 GHz+ 4 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    300 W left arrow 300 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 345 W
  • Tjunction max
    96 °C left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    3 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    3 x 100 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow 1 x 90 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    35 dB left arrow 36 dB
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 2x DP v1.4a
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    MSI Mystic Light left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
Dimensions
  • Length
    324 mm left arrow 340 mm
  • Height
    142 mm left arrow 139 mm
  • Width
    55 mm left arrow 57 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    1564 g left arrow --
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q4/2020
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 1,099 $
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow RX-69XTACUD9
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons