Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 OC 4G (rev. 3.0)
ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC

Comparando GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 OC 4G (rev. 3.0) vs ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2017

Comparação da placa de vídeo GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 OC 4G (rev. 3.0) versus placa de vídeo ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC por especificações e benchmarks. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 OC 4G (rev. 3.0) roda na velocidade base de 1.199 GHz+ 2 % e tem 4 GB de memória GDDR5, enquanto a placa de vídeo ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC roda na velocidade base de 1.199 GHz+ 2 % e tem 6 GB de memória GDDR6. O peso é diferente, -- vs 400 g. O TDP da primeira placa de vídeo é 75 W e a segunda é 75 W . Compare os resultados do benchmark para descobrir qual placa de vídeo é melhor.

Differences
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 OC 4G (rev. 3.0)
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.250 GHz left arrow 1.199 GHz+ 2 %
    Around 47% better clock speed
  • More memory
    6 GB left arrow 4 GB
    33% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 OC 4G (rev. 3.0) vs ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 OC 4G (rev. 3.0) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 OC 4G (rev. 3.0)
ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC
GPU

gpu GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 OC 4G (rev. 3.0) item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 560 (16 CU) left arrow Intel Arc A380 Graphics
  • GPU Chip
    Polaris 21 XT (GCN 4) left arrow ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
  • Execution units
    16 left arrow 128
  • Shader
    1024 left arrow 1024
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    64 left arrow 64
  • Raytracing Cores
    0 left arrow 8
Memory
  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 6 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.500 GHz left arrow 1.938 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    6 Gbps left arrow 15.5 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    96 GB/s left arrow 186 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 96 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.199 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 2.250 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.199 GHz-6 % left arrow
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.189 GHz left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 75 W
  • PCIe-Power
    left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 90 mm left arrow 1 x 100 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow 44 dB
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow --
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 3x DP v2.0
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow --
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    5120x2880 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12 left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions
  • Length
    170 mm left arrow 190 mm
  • Height
    115 mm left arrow 124 mm
  • Width
    29 mm left arrow 39 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 400 g
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 8
  • Release date
    Q2/2017 left arrow Q3/2022
  • Launch Price
    99 $ (Reference) left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    GV-RX560OC-4GD left arrow A380 CLI 6GO
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons