Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Neptune OC-V
INNO3D GeForce RTX 4090 ICHILL BLACK

Comparando Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Neptune OC-V vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 4090 ICHILL BLACK

Comparação da placa de vídeo Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Neptune OC-V versus placa de vídeo INNO3D GeForce RTX 4090 ICHILL BLACK por especificações e benchmarks. Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Neptune OC-V roda na velocidade base de 1.560 GHz-7 % e tem 24 GB de memória GDDR6X, enquanto a placa de vídeo INNO3D GeForce RTX 4090 ICHILL BLACK roda na velocidade base de 1.560 GHz-7 % e tem 24 GB de memória GDDR6X. O peso é diferente, 2200 g vs --. O TDP da primeira placa de vídeo é 450 W e a segunda é 450 W . Compare os resultados do benchmark para descobrir qual placa de vídeo é melhor.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Neptune OC-V
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
INNO3D GeForce RTX 4090 ICHILL BLACK
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.230 GHz left arrow 1.560 GHz-7 %
    Around 30% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Neptune OC-V vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 4090 ICHILL BLACK
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Neptune OC-V Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Neptune OC-V
INNO3D GeForce RTX 4090 ICHILL BLACK INNO3D GeForce RTX 4090 ICHILL BLACK
GPU

gpu Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Neptune OC-V item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti left arrow NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
  • GPU Chip
    GA102-350-A1 (Ampere) left arrow AD102 (Ada Lovelace)
  • Execution units
    84 left arrow 128
  • Shader
    10752 left arrow 16384
  • Render Output Units
    112 left arrow 192
  • Texture Units
    336 left arrow 512
  • Raytracing Cores
    84 left arrow 128
Memory
  • Memory Size
    24 GB left arrow 24 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6X left arrow GDDR6X
  • Memory Clock
    1.313 GHz left arrow 1.313 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    21 Gbps left arrow 21 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    1008 GB/s left arrow 1008 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    384 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.560 GHz-7 % left arrow 2.230 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.905 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 2.580 GHz+ 2 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.860 GHz left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    450 W left arrow 450 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 450 W-25 %
  • Tjunction max
    92 \xc2\xb0C left arrow 90 \xc2\xb0C
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 16-Pin left arrow 1 x 16-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Radial / Axial (Radiator) left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 60 mm left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    2 x 120 mm left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    AIO water cooling left arrow Water cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow 0 dB
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    iGame Energy Core left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
Dimensions
  • Length
    258 mm left arrow 280 mm
  • Height
    153 mm left arrow 137 mm
  • Width
    43 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    2200 g left arrow --
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Launch Price
    1,999 $ (Reference) left arrow 1,999 $
  • Structure size
    8 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons