Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5

Comparando ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC vs ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5

Comparação da placa de vídeo ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC versus placa de vídeo ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5 por especificações e benchmarks. ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC roda na velocidade base de 2.250 GHz e tem 6 GB de memória GDDR6, enquanto a placa de vídeo ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5 roda na velocidade base de 2.250 GHz e tem 4 GB de memória GDDR5. O peso é diferente, 400 g vs --. O TDP da primeira placa de vídeo é 75 W e a segunda é 75 W . Compare os resultados do benchmark para descobrir qual placa de vídeo é melhor.

Differences
Reasons to consider
ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.250 GHz left arrow 1.175 GHz
    Around 48% better clock speed
  • More memory
    6 GB left arrow 4 GB
    33% more memory
Reasons to consider
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC vs ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5 ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5
GPU

gpu ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC item

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A380 Graphics left arrow AMD Radeon RX 560 (16 CU)
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow Polaris 21 XT (GCN 4)
  • Execution units
    128 left arrow 16
  • Shader
    1024 left arrow 1024
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 16
  • Texture Units
    64 left arrow 64
  • Raytracing Cores
    8 left arrow 0
Memory
  • Memory Size
    6 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.750 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 7 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    186 GB/s left arrow 112 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    96 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    2.250 GHz left arrow 1.175 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    left arrow 1.285 GHz+ 1 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.275 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    75 W left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 8-Pin left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 100 mm left arrow 2 x 75 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    44 dB left arrow --
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    -- left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v2.0 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 5120x2880
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow ASUS Aura Sync
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    190 mm left arrow 194 mm
  • Height
    124 mm left arrow 120 mm
  • Width
    39 mm left arrow 35 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    400 g left arrow --
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 8
  • Release date
    Q3/2022 left arrow Q2/2017
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow 99 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    A380 CLI 6GO left arrow ROG-STRIX-RX560-4G-GAMING
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons