Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Dual Black (1-Click OC) V2

Porównanie GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G z KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Dual Black (1-Click OC) V2

Porównanie karty wideo GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G z kartą wideo KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Dual Black (1-Click OC) V2 według specyfikacji i testów porównawczych. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G działa z podstawową szybkością zegara 1.650 GHz i ma 8 GB pamięci GDDR6, podczas gdy karta graficzna KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Dual Black (1-Click OC) V2 działa z podstawową szybkością zegara 1.650 GHz i ma 11 GB z GDDR6 pamięci. Waga jest inna, -- i --. TDP pierwszej karty graficznej to 250 W, a drugiej to 250 W . Porównaj wyniki testu porównawczego, aby dowiedzieć się, która karta wideo jest lepsza.

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Dual Black (1-Click OC) V2
Differences
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.650 GHz left arrow 1.350 GHz
    Around 18% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Dual Black (1-Click OC) V2
Report a bug
  • More memory
    11 GB left arrow 8 GB
    27% more memory
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Dual Black (1-Click OC) V2 KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Dual Black (1-Click OC) V2
GPU

gpu GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER left arrow NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    TU104 left arrow TU102
  • Execution units
    48 left arrow 68
  • Shader
    3072 left arrow 4352
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 88
  • Texture Units
    192 left arrow 272
Memory
  • Memory Size
    8 GB left arrow 11 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.75 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    496 GB/s left arrow 616 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 352 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.650 GHz left arrow 1.350 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.860 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 1.590 GHz+ 3 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.815 GHz left arrow 1.545 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • TDP (up)
    280 W left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Water cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow 2 x 90 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    0 dB left arrow --
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    3x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • USB-C Ports
    1 left arrow --
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    GIGABYTE RGB Fusion left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    291 mm left arrow 283 mm
  • Height
    159 mm left arrow 139 mm
  • Width
    29 mm left arrow 41 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2019 left arrow Q3/2018
  • Release price
    949 $ left arrow --
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    GV-N208SAORUS WB-8GC left arrow 28IULBMDT4BK
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons