HiSilicon Kirin 935
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Porównanie HiSilicon Kirin 935 z HiSilicon Kirin 935

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2015
Released
Q1/2015
Overall score
star star star star star

Porównanie kart graficznych. HiSilicon Kirin 935 kontra HiSilicon Kirin 935 w testach porównawczych i specyfikacjach.

Differences
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 935
Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 4
    2 times more threads
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz
    Around 6% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    2.40 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz
    Around 8 % better overclocked clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Intel Atom x7-Z8700
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
HiSilicon Kirin 935 HiSilicon Kirin 935
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 Intel Atom x7-Z8700
CPU generation and family

description_compare HiSilicon Kirin 935 and Intel Atom x7-Z8700

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 935 left arrow Intel Atom x7-Z8700
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 930 left arrow Intel Atom x3/x5/x7
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

  • Frequency
    1.50 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.20 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow normal
  • A core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow --
  • B core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow --
Internal Graphics
  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T628 MP4 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 405 (16EU)
  • GPU frequency
    0.68 GHz left arrow 0.20 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.68 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 16
  • Shader
    64 left arrow 128
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    Midgard 2 left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    32nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2012 left arrow Q2/2015
Hardware codec support
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
Memory & PCIe
  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-1600 left arrow LPDDR3-1600
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management
  • TDP (PL1)
    left arrow 2 W
Technical details
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Cherry Trail
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow BGA 138
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow Q1/2015
Devices using this processor
  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons