Select processor 1
Select processor 2
PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700
XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 CORE Gaming

Confronto tra XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 CORE Gaming e PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2022

Confronto tra scheda video XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 CORE Gaming e scheda video PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700 per specifiche e benchmark. XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 CORE Gaming funziona a 2.132 GHz+ 10 % velocità di clock di base e ha 10 GB di GDDR6 di memoria, mentre la scheda video PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700 funziona a 2.132 GHz+ 10 % velocità di clock di base e ha 10 GB di GDDR6 memoria. Il peso è diverso, -- rispetto a --. Il TDP della prima scheda video è 220 W+ 26 % e la seconda è 220 W+ 26 % . Confronta i risultati del benchmark per scoprire quale scheda video è migliore.

XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 CORE Gaming
Differences
Reasons to consider
PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 CORE Gaming
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.132 GHz+ 10 % left arrow 1.941 GHz
    Around 9% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700 vs XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 CORE Gaming
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700 PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700
XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 CORE Gaming XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 CORE Gaming
GPU

gpu PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700 item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6700 left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6700
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 22 (RDNA 2) left arrow Navi 22 (RDNA 2)
  • Execution units
    36 left arrow 36
  • Shader
    2304 left arrow 2304
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    144 left arrow 144
  • Raytracing Cores
    36 left arrow 36
Memory
  • Memory Size
    10 GB left arrow 10 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    16 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    320 GB/s left arrow 320 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    160 bit left arrow 160 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.941 GHz left arrow 2.132 GHz+ 10 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.495 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 2.425 GHz-1 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.330 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 2.293 GHz+ 5 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    220 W+ 26 % left arrow 220 W+ 26 %
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    2 x 90 mm left arrow 3 x 90 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4 left arrow 3x DP v1.4
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
Dimensions
  • Length
    228 mm left arrow 304 mm
  • Height
    109 mm left arrow 123 mm
  • Width
    32 mm left arrow 42 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q3/2022
  • Launch Price
    429 $ (Reference) left arrow 429 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    AXRX 6700 10GBD6-3DH/OC left arrow RX-67XLKWFDV
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons