Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5

Confronto tra ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6) e ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5

Confronto tra scheda video ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6) e scheda video ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5 per specifiche e benchmark. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6) funziona a 1.410 GHz velocità di clock di base e ha 4 GB di GDDR6 di memoria, mentre la scheda video ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5 funziona a 1.410 GHz velocità di clock di base e ha 4 GB di GDDR5 memoria. Il peso è diverso, -- rispetto a --. Il TDP della prima scheda video è 75 W e la seconda è 75 W . Confronta i risultati del benchmark per scoprire quale scheda video è migliore.

ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)
Differences
Reasons to consider
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.410 GHz left arrow 1.175 GHz
    Around 17% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6) vs ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6) ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5 ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 560 Gaming 4GB GDDR5
GPU

gpu ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6) item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) left arrow AMD Radeon RX 560 (16 CU)
  • GPU Chip
    TU117-300-A1 / TU106-125-A1 / TU116-150-KA-A1 (Turing) left arrow Polaris 21 XT (GCN 4)
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 16
  • Shader
    896 left arrow 1024
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 16
  • Texture Units
    56 left arrow 64
Memory
  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Clock
    1.500 GHz left arrow 1.750 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    12 Gbps left arrow 7 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    192 GB/s left arrow 112 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.410 GHz left arrow 1.175 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.665 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.285 GHz+ 1 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.635 GHz left arrow 1.275 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 100 mm left arrow 2 x 75 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow 0 dB / Silent
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 5120x2880
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow ASUS Aura Sync
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    197 mm left arrow 194 mm
  • Height
    121 mm left arrow 120 mm
  • Width
    39 mm left arrow 35 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 8
  • Release date
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q2/2017
  • Launch Price
    149 $ (Reference) left arrow 99 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow ROG-STRIX-RX560-4G-GAMING
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons