Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 980 Ti V2

Confronto tra ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC e Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 980 Ti V2

Confronto tra scheda video ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC e scheda video Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 980 Ti V2 per specifiche e benchmark. ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC funziona a 2.235 GHz+ 2 % velocità di clock di base e ha 12 GB di GDDR6 di memoria, mentre la scheda video Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 980 Ti V2 funziona a 2.235 GHz+ 2 % velocità di clock di base e ha 6 GB di GDDR5 memoria. Il peso è diverso, 890 g rispetto a --. Il TDP della prima scheda video è 250 W e la seconda è 250 W . Confronta i risultati del benchmark per scoprire quale scheda video è migliore.

Differences
Reasons to consider
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.235 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 1.076 GHz+ 8 %
    Around 52% better clock speed
  • More memory
    12 GB left arrow 6 GB
    50% more memory
Reasons to consider
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 980 Ti V2
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 980 Ti V2
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 980 Ti V2 Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 980 Ti V2
GPU

gpu ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 22 KXT (RDNA 2) left arrow GM200-310-A1 (Maxwell 2.0)
  • Execution units
    40 left arrow 22
  • Shader
    2560 left arrow 2816
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 96
  • Texture Units
    160 left arrow 176
  • Raytracing Cores
    40 left arrow 0
Memory
  • Memory Size
    12 GB left arrow 6 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Clock
    2.250 GHz left arrow 1.753 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    18 Gbps left arrow 7.01 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    432 GB/s left arrow 337 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    192 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    2.235 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 1.076 GHz+ 8 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.618 GHz+ 1 % left arrow 1.140 GHz+ 6 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.512 GHz+ 1 % left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 92 \xc2\xb0C
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 3 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    3 x 90 mm left arrow 3 x 80 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.2
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 4096x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    303 mm left arrow --
  • Height
    131 mm left arrow --
  • Width
    45 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    890 g left arrow --
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2022 left arrow Q2/2015
  • Launch Price
    549 $ (Reference) left arrow 649 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Part-no
    RX6750XT CLP 12GO left arrow IGAME980TI-6GD5-V2
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow --
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons