Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Intel Arc A580 Graphics
GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano

Comparing Intel Arc A580 Graphics vs GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
2022

Comparison of Intel Arc A580 Graphics video card vs GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano video card by specs and benchmarks. Intel Arc A580 Graphics runs at 1.700 GHz base clock speed and has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, while video card GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano runs at 1.700 GHz base clock speed and has 4 GB of HBM memory. The weight is different, -- vs --. The TDP of the first video card is 175 W, and the second is 175 W . Compare the benchmark results to find out which video card is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Arc A580 Graphics
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.700 GHz left arrow 1.000 GHz
    Around 41% better clock speed
  • More memory
    8 GB left arrow 4 GB
    50% more memory
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Arc A580 Graphics vs GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Arc A580 Graphics Intel Arc A580 Graphics
GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano
GPU

gpu Intel Arc A580 Graphics item

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A580 Graphics left arrow AMD Radeon R9 Nano
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G10 (Alchemist) left arrow Fiji XT CA (Fiji)
  • Execution units
    384 left arrow 64
  • Shader
    3072 left arrow 4096
  • Render Output Units
    96 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    192 left arrow 256
  • Raytracing Cores
    24 left arrow 0
Memory
  • Memory Size
    8 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow HBM
  • Memory Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 0.500 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    16 Gbps left arrow 1 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 4096 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.700 GHz left arrow 1.000 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.700 GHz left arrow 1.000 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    175 W left arrow 175 W
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 8-Pin left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial (Radiator)
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow 1 x 90 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow --
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 0
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 1x HDMI v1.4a
  • DP Ports
    -- left arrow 3x DP v1.2
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 4096x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_0
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    -- left arrow 154 mm
  • Height
    -- left arrow 105 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 35 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    -- left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    2022 left arrow Q3/2015
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow 649 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow GV-R9NANO-4GD-B
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons