Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon RX 6700

Comparing GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6700

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2015

Comparison of GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano video card vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 video card by specs and benchmarks. GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano runs at 1.000 GHz base clock speed and has 4 GB of HBM memory, while video card AMD Radeon RX 6700 runs at 1.000 GHz base clock speed and has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory. The weight is different, -- vs --. The TDP of the first video card is 175 W, and the second is 175 W . Compare the benchmark results to find out which video card is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
AMD Radeon RX 6700
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.941 GHz left arrow 1.000 GHz
    Around 48% better clock speed
  • More memory
    10 GB left arrow 4 GB
    60% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6700
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon RX 6700 AMD Radeon RX 6700
GPU

gpu GIGABYTE Radeon R9 Nano item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon R9 Nano left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6700
  • GPU Chip
    Fiji XT CA (Fiji) left arrow Navi 22 (RDNA 2)
  • Execution units
    64 left arrow 36
  • Shader
    4096 left arrow 2304
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    256 left arrow 144
  • Raytracing Cores
    0 left arrow 36
Memory
  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 10 GB
  • Memory Type
    HBM left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    0.500 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    1 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 320 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    4096 bit left arrow 160 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.000 GHz left arrow 1.941 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.000 GHz left arrow 2.450 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 2.174 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    175 W left arrow 175 W
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 8-Pin left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial (Radiator) left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 90 mm left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow 0 dB / Silent
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    0 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v1.4a left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.2 left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    4096x2160 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_0 left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
Dimensions
  • Length
    154 mm left arrow --
  • Height
    105 mm left arrow --
  • Width
    35 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2015 left arrow Q3/2021
  • Launch Price
    649 $ (Reference) left arrow 429 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    28 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    GV-R9NANO-4GD-B left arrow --
  • Documents
    -- left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons