Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC 4G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

Comparing Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC 4G vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019

Comparison of Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC 4G video card vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB video card by specs and benchmarks. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC 4G runs at 1.485 GHz base clock speed and has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, while video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB runs at 1.485 GHz base clock speed and has 3 GB of GDDR5 memory. The weight is different, -- vs . The TDP of the first video card is 75 W, and the second is 75 W . Compare the benchmark results to find out which video card is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC 4G
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.392 GHz
    Around 6% better clock speed
  • More memory
    4 GB left arrow 3 GB
    25% more memory
Reasons to consider
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC 4G vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC 4G Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC 4G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
GPU

gpu Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC 4G item

  • GPU Chip
    TU117-300-A1 left arrow GP107-301-A1
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    896 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 24
  • Texture Units
    56 left arrow 48
Memory
  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 3 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 7 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    128 GB/s left arrow 84 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 96 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.392 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.785 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 1.518 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.665 GHz left arrow --
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    3840x2160 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q2/2018
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 14 nm
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons