Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition
XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Core Gaming

Comparing GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition vs XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Core Gaming

Comparison of GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition video card vs XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Core Gaming video card by specs and benchmarks. GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition runs at 1.650 GHz base clock speed and has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, while video card XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Core Gaming runs at 1.650 GHz base clock speed and has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. The weight is different, -- vs --. The TDP of the first video card is 250 W, and the second is 250 W . Compare the benchmark results to find out which video card is better.

GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition
XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Core Gaming
Differences
Reasons to consider
GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Core Gaming
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.150 GHz-2 % left arrow 1.650 GHz
    Around 23% better clock speed
  • More memory
    12 GB left arrow 8 GB
    33% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition vs XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Core Gaming
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition
XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Core Gaming XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Core Gaming
GPU

gpu GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
  • GPU Chip
    TU104 left arrow Navi 22 KXT (RDNA 2)
  • Execution units
    48 left arrow 40
  • Shader
    3072 left arrow 2560
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    192 left arrow 160
Memory
  • Memory Size
    8 GB left arrow 12 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    1.938 GHz left arrow 18 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    496 GB/s left arrow 432 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 192 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.650 GHz left arrow 2.150 GHz-2 %
  • Boost Clock
    1.860 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 2.600 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.845 GHz left arrow 2.495 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    3 x 90 mm left arrow 2 x 90 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow 1 x 100 mm
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    Addressable LED left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
Dimensions
  • Length
    328 mm left arrow 323 mm
  • Height
    150 mm left arrow 132 mm
  • Width
    53 mm left arrow 51 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2019 left arrow Q2/2022
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    28ISL6MD24WF left arrow RX-675XYJFDP
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons