Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition
XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Black Edition

Comparing ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition vs XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Black Edition

Comparison of ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition video card vs XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Black Edition video card by specs and benchmarks. ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition runs at 2.135 GHz+ 17 % base clock speed and has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, while video card XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Black Edition runs at 2.135 GHz+ 17 % base clock speed and has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory. The weight is different, -- vs --. The TDP of the first video card is 300 W, and the second is 300 W . Compare the benchmark results to find out which video card is better.

XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Black Edition
Differences
Reasons to consider
ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.135 GHz+ 17 % left arrow 1.500 GHz
    Around 30% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Black Edition
Report a bug
  • More memory
    20 GB left arrow 16 GB
    20% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition vs XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Black Edition
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition
XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Black Edition XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Black Edition
GPU

gpu ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT left arrow AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 left arrow Navi 31 (RDNA 3)
  • Execution units
    80 left arrow 84
  • Shader
    5120 left arrow 5376
  • Render Output Units
    128 left arrow 192
  • Texture Units
    320 left arrow 336
Memory
  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 20 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.500 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    16 Gbps left arrow 20 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 800 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 320 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    2.135 GHz+ 17 % left arrow 1.500 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.390 GHz+ 6 % left arrow 2.560 GHz+ 7 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.335 GHz+ 16 % left arrow 2.220 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    300 W left arrow 300 W
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    3 x 100 mm left arrow 3 x 100 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    34 dB left arrow --
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v2.1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    ASUS Aura Sync left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions
  • Length
    320 mm left arrow 344 mm
  • Height
    140 mm left arrow 128 mm
  • Width
    58 mm left arrow 55 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow --
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4 x 16
  • Release date
    Q4/2021 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Part-no
    TUF-RX6900XT-T16G-GAMING left arrow RX-79TMERCB9
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons