Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO 4GB (GDDR6)
PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 560 16CU 2GB GDDR5 OC V3

Comparing ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO 4GB (GDDR6) vs PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 560 16CU 2GB GDDR5 OC V3

Comparison of ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO 4GB (GDDR6) video card vs PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 560 16CU 2GB GDDR5 OC V3 video card by specs and benchmarks. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO 4GB (GDDR6) runs at 1.410 GHz base clock speed and has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, while video card PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 560 16CU 2GB GDDR5 OC V3 runs at 1.410 GHz base clock speed and has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory. The weight is different, -- vs --. The TDP of the first video card is 75 W, and the second is 75 W . Compare the benchmark results to find out which video card is better.

PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 560 16CU 2GB GDDR5 OC V3
Differences
Reasons to consider
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO 4GB (GDDR6)
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.410 GHz left arrow 1.175 GHz
    Around 17% better clock speed
  • More memory
    4 GB left arrow 2 GB
    50% more memory
Reasons to consider
PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 560 16CU 2GB GDDR5 OC V3
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO 4GB (GDDR6) vs PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 560 16CU 2GB GDDR5 OC V3
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO 4GB (GDDR6) ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO 4GB (GDDR6)
PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 560 16CU 2GB GDDR5 OC V3 PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 560 16CU 2GB GDDR5 OC V3
GPU

gpu ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 EVO 4GB (GDDR6) item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) left arrow AMD Radeon RX 560 (16 CU)
  • GPU Chip
    TU117-300-A1 / TU106-125-A1 / TU116-150-KA-A1 (Turing) left arrow Polaris 21 XT (GCN 4)
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 16
  • Shader
    896 left arrow 1024
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 16
  • Texture Units
    56 left arrow 64
Memory
  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 2 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Clock
    1.500 GHz left arrow 1.750 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    12 Gbps left arrow 7 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    192 GB/s left arrow 112 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.410 GHz left arrow 1.175 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.620 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 1.180 GHz-7 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.590 GHz left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 100 mm left arrow 1 x 90 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow 0 dB / Silent
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 5120x2880
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    197 mm left arrow 225 mm
  • Height
    121 mm left arrow 128 mm
  • Width
    39 mm left arrow 38 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 8
  • Release date
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q2/2017
  • Launch Price
    149 $ (Reference) left arrow 99 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow AXRX 560 2GBD5-DHV3/OC
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons