Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASRock Radeon RX 560 Phantom Gaming Elite 4GB
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 V2 OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)

Comparing ASRock Radeon RX 560 Phantom Gaming Elite 4GB vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 V2 OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)

Comparison of ASRock Radeon RX 560 Phantom Gaming Elite 4GB video card vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 V2 OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6) video card by specs and benchmarks. ASRock Radeon RX 560 Phantom Gaming Elite 4GB runs at 1.199 GHz+ 2 % base clock speed and has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, while video card ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 V2 OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6) runs at 1.199 GHz+ 2 % base clock speed and has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The weight is different, -- vs --. The TDP of the first video card is 75 W, and the second is 75 W . Compare the benchmark results to find out which video card is better.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 V2 OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)
Differences
Reasons to consider
ASRock Radeon RX 560 Phantom Gaming Elite 4GB
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 V2 OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.410 GHz left arrow 1.199 GHz+ 2 %
    Around 15% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests ASRock Radeon RX 560 Phantom Gaming Elite 4GB vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 V2 OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
ASRock Radeon RX 560 Phantom Gaming Elite 4GB ASRock Radeon RX 560 Phantom Gaming Elite 4GB
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 V2 OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 V2 OC Edition 4GB (GDDR6)
GPU

gpu ASRock Radeon RX 560 Phantom Gaming Elite 4GB item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 560 (16 CU) left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
  • GPU Chip
    Polaris 21 XT (GCN 4) left arrow TU117-300-A1 / TU106-125-A1 / TU116-150-KA-A1 (Turing)
  • Execution units
    16 left arrow 14
  • Shader
    1024 left arrow 896
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    64 left arrow 56
Memory
  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.700 GHz left arrow 1.500 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    6.8 Gbps left arrow 12 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    109 GB/s left arrow 192 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.199 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 1.410 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.199 GHz-6 % left arrow 1.665 GHz+ 5 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.635 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 8-Pin left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    2 x 90 mm left arrow 2 x 80 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow --
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    2x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    5120x2880 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    240 mm left arrow 205 mm
  • Height
    129 mm left arrow 125 mm
  • Width
    42 mm left arrow 47 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2017 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Launch Price
    99 $ (Reference) left arrow 149 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    RX560-PGE-4G left arrow TUF-GTX1650-O4GD6-P-V2-GAMING
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons