AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Intel Xeon E-2356G
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Comparaison entre AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX et AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2020
Released
Q3/2021
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparaison des cartes vidéo. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX contre AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX dans les benchmarks et les spécifications.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
    Around -9% better clock speed
  • More number of cores
    32 left arrow 6
    2 times more threads
Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon E-2356G
Report a bug
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    5.00 GHz left arrow 4.20 GHz
    Around 16 % better overclocked clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    80 W left arrow 280 W
    About 0.29 times less performance per watt
Performance tests
Real tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Intel Xeon E-2356G
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Intel Xeon E-2356G Intel Xeon E-2356G
CPU generation and family

description_compare AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Intel Xeon E-2356G

  • Name
    AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX left arrow Intel Xeon E-2356G
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Ryzen left arrow Intel Xeon E
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 9
  • CPU group
    AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3000 left arrow Intel Xeon E-2300
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

  • Frequency
    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    32 left arrow 6
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.20 GHz left arrow 5.00 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    64 left arrow 12
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics
  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel UHD Graphics P750
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.35 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 32
  • Shader
    left arrow 256
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 12
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 12
  • Technology
    left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q2/2021
Hardware codec support
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe
  • Memory type
    DDR4-3200 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • Max. Memory
    2048 GB left arrow 128 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    4.0 left arrow 4.0
  • PCIe lanes
    72 left arrow 20
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management
  • TDP (PL1)
    280 W left arrow 80 W
  • Tjunction max.
    95 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technical details
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L2-Cache
    16.00 MB left arrow 3.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    128.00 MB left arrow 12.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Castle Peak (Zen 2) left arrow Rocket Lake S
  • Technology
    7 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    WRX8 (sWRX8) left arrow LGA 1200
  • Release date
    Q3/2020 left arrow Q3/2021
Devices using this processor
  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons