Select processor 1
Select processor 2
XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 319 Radeon RX 6800 CORE
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC

Comparando XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 319 Radeon RX 6800 CORE vs ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2021

Comparación de la tarjeta de video XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 319 Radeon RX 6800 CORE con la tarjeta de video ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC por especificaciones y puntos de referencia. XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 319 Radeon RX 6800 CORE funciona a 1.700 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 16 GB de GDDR6 memoria, mientras que la tarjeta de video ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC funciona a 1.700 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 12 GB de GDDR6 de memoria. El peso es diferente, -- frente a 890 g. El TDP de la primera tarjeta de video es 250 W, y el segundo es 250 W . Compare los resultados de referencia para averiguar qué tarjeta de video es mejor.

Differences
Reasons to consider
XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 319 Radeon RX 6800 CORE
Report a bug
  • More memory
    16 GB left arrow 12 GB
    25% more memory
Reasons to consider
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.235 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 1.700 GHz
    Around 24% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 319 Radeon RX 6800 CORE vs ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 319 Radeon RX 6800 CORE XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 319 Radeon RX 6800 CORE
ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
GPU

gpu XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 319 Radeon RX 6800 CORE item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6800 left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 left arrow Navi 22 KXT (RDNA 2)
  • Execution units
    60 left arrow 40
  • Shader
    3840 left arrow 2560
  • Render Output Units
    96 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    240 left arrow 160
Memory
  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 12 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 18 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 432 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 192 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.700 GHz left arrow 2.235 GHz+ 2 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.105 GHz left arrow 2.618 GHz+ 1 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.815 GHz left arrow 2.512 GHz+ 1 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • TDP (up)
    285 W left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 100 mm left arrow 3 x 90 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    1 x 90 mm left arrow --
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    Addressable LED left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
Dimensions
  • Length
    340 mm left arrow 303 mm
  • Height
    130 mm left arrow 131 mm
  • Width
    52 mm left arrow 45 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 890 g
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2021 left arrow Q2/2022
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    RX-68XLAQFD9 left arrow RX6750XT CLP 12GO
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons