Select processor 1
Select processor 2
XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming
GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6900 XT Master 16G

Comparando XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6900 XT Master 16G

Comparación de la tarjeta de video XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming con la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6900 XT Master 16G por especificaciones y puntos de referencia. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming funciona a 1.825 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 16 GB de GDDR6 memoria, mientras que la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6900 XT Master 16G funciona a 1.825 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 16 GB de GDDR6 de memoria. El peso es diferente, 1817 g frente a --. El TDP de la primera tarjeta de video es 300 W, y el segundo es 300 W . Compare los resultados de referencia para averiguar qué tarjeta de video es mejor.

XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming
Differences
Reasons to consider
XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6900 XT Master 16G
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.950 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 1.825 GHz
    Around 6% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming
GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6900 XT Master 16G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6900 XT Master 16G
GPU

gpu XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 XT left arrow Navi 21
  • Execution units
    72 left arrow 80
  • Shader
    4608 left arrow 5120
  • Render Output Units
    128 left arrow 128
  • Texture Units
    288 left arrow 320
Memory
  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.825 GHz left arrow 1.950 GHz+ 7 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.250 GHz left arrow 2.365 GHz+ 5 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.015 GHz left arrow 2.150 GHz+ 7 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    300 W left arrow 300 W
  • TDP (up)
    345 W left arrow 345 W
  • Tjunction max
    96 °C left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 3 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 105 mm left arrow 2 x 110 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    1 x 90 mm left arrow 1 x 100 mm
  • Noise (Load)
    35-36 dB left arrow 36 dB
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 2x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 2x DP v1.4a
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    Addressable LED left arrow GIGABYTE RGB Fusion
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
Dimensions
  • Length
    340 mm left arrow 322 mm
  • Height
    138 mm left arrow 140 mm
  • Width
    54 mm left arrow 60 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    1817 g left arrow --
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q1/2021 left arrow Q4/2020
  • Release price
    749 $ left arrow 1,249 $
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    RX-68XTALFD9 left arrow GV-R69XTAORUS M-16GD
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons