Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming 16G
ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XT Taichi 20GB OC

Comparando GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming 16G vs ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XT Taichi 20GB OC

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2020

Comparación de la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming 16G con la tarjeta de video ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XT Taichi 20GB OC por especificaciones y puntos de referencia. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming 16G funciona a 1.825 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 16 GB de GDDR6 memoria, mientras que la tarjeta de video ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XT Taichi 20GB OC funciona a 1.825 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 20 GB de GDDR6 de memoria. El peso es diferente, -- frente a 1835 g. El TDP de la primera tarjeta de video es 300 W, y el segundo es 300 W . Compare los resultados de referencia para averiguar qué tarjeta de video es mejor.

Differences
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming 16G
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.825 GHz left arrow 1.500 GHz
    Around 18% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XT Taichi 20GB OC
Report a bug
  • More memory
    20 GB left arrow 16 GB
    20% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming 16G vs ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XT Taichi 20GB OC
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming 16G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming 16G
ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XT Taichi 20GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XT Taichi 20GB OC
GPU

gpu GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming 16G item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT left arrow AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 XT left arrow Navi 31 (RDNA 3)
  • Execution units
    72 left arrow 84
  • Shader
    4608 left arrow 5376
  • Render Output Units
    128 left arrow 192
  • Texture Units
    288 left arrow 336
Memory
  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 20 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 20 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 800 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 320 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.825 GHz left arrow 1.500 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.250 GHz left arrow 2.560 GHz+ 7 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.015 GHz left arrow 2.220 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    300 W left arrow 300 W
  • TDP (up)
    345 W left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    96 °C left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 3 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    3 x 80 mm left arrow 2 x 110 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow 1 x 100 mm
  • Noise (Load)
    36-37 dB left arrow --
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    2x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    2x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v2.1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    GIGABYTE RGB Fusion left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions
  • Length
    286 mm left arrow 345 mm
  • Height
    118 mm left arrow 140 mm
  • Width
    58 mm left arrow 61 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 1835 g
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4 x 16
  • Release date
    Q4/2020 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Part-no
    GV-R68XTGAMING-16GD left arrow RX7900XT TC 20GO
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons