Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC Waterforce WB 8G
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Turbo 11G

Comparando GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC Waterforce WB 8G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Turbo 11G

Comparación de la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC Waterforce WB 8G con la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Turbo 11G por especificaciones y puntos de referencia. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC Waterforce WB 8G funciona a 1.650 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 8 GB de GDDR6 memoria, mientras que la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Turbo 11G funciona a 1.650 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 11 GB de GDDR6 de memoria. El peso es diferente, -- frente a --. El TDP de la primera tarjeta de video es 250 W, y el segundo es 250 W . Compare los resultados de referencia para averiguar qué tarjeta de video es mejor.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC Waterforce WB 8G
Differences
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC Waterforce WB 8G
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.650 GHz left arrow 1.350 GHz
    Around 18% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Turbo 11G
Report a bug
  • More memory
    11 GB left arrow 8 GB
    27% more memory
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC Waterforce WB 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC Waterforce WB 8G
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Turbo 11G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Turbo 11G
GPU

gpu GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC Waterforce WB 8G item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER left arrow NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    TU104 left arrow TU102
  • Execution units
    48 left arrow 68
  • Shader
    3072 left arrow 4352
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 88
  • Texture Units
    192 left arrow 272
Memory
  • Memory Size
    8 GB left arrow 11 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.75 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    496 GB/s left arrow 616 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 352 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.650 GHz left arrow 1.350 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.845 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 1.650 GHz+ 7 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.815 GHz left arrow 1.545 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • TDP (up)
    280 W left arrow 320 W
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow Radial
  • Cooler-Type
    Water cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow 1 x 70 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    0 dB left arrow 45 dB
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    GIGABYTE RGB Fusion left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    267 mm left arrow 271 mm
  • Height
    137 mm left arrow 113 mm
  • Width
    37 mm left arrow 36 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2019 left arrow Q3/2018
  • Release price
    949 $ left arrow 1,579 $
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    GV-N208SGAMINGOC WB-8GD left arrow GV-N208TAORUS T-11GC
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons