Select processor 1
Select processor 2
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G
GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Ti HOF

Comparando GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Ti HOF

Comparación de la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G con la tarjeta de video GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Ti HOF por especificaciones y puntos de referencia. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G funciona a 1.560 GHz-7 % velocidad de reloj base y tiene 24 GB de GDDR6X memoria, mientras que la tarjeta de video GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Ti HOF funciona a 1.560 GHz-7 % velocidad de reloj base y tiene 24 GB de GDDR6X de memoria. El peso es diferente, -- frente a --. El TDP de la primera tarjeta de video es 450 W, y el segundo es 450 W . Compare los resultados de referencia para averiguar qué tarjeta de video es mejor.

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G
Differences
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Ti HOF
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Ti HOF
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G
GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Ti HOF GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Ti HOF
GPU

gpu GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 Ti XTREME WATERFORCE 24G item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti left arrow NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    GA102-350-A1 (Ampere) left arrow GA102-350-A1 (Ampere)
  • Execution units
    84 left arrow 84
  • Shader
    10752 left arrow 10752
  • Render Output Units
    112 left arrow 112
  • Texture Units
    336 left arrow 336
  • Raytracing Cores
    84 left arrow 84
Memory
  • Memory Size
    24 GB left arrow 24 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6X left arrow GDDR6X
  • Memory Clock
    1.313 GHz left arrow 1.313 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    21 Gbps left arrow 21 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    1008 GB/s left arrow 1008 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    384 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.560 GHz-7 % left arrow 1.560 GHz-7 %
  • Boost Clock
    1.935 GHz+ 4 % left arrow 1.935 GHz+ 4 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.920 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    450 W left arrow 450 W
  • Tjunction max
    92 \xc2\xb0C left arrow 92 \xc2\xb0C
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 16-Pin left arrow 6 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial (Radiator) left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    3 x 120 mm left arrow 2 x 102 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow 1 x 92 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
Dimensions
  • Length
    238 mm left arrow 352 mm
  • Height
    141 mm left arrow 160 mm
  • Width
    40 mm left arrow 68 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 4 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q2/2022
  • Launch Price
    1,999 $ (Reference) left arrow 1,999 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    8 nm left arrow 8 nm
  • Part-no
    GV-N309TAORUSX W-24GD left arrow 39IXM5MD5ZEH
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons