Select processor 1
Select processor 2
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti HYBRID GAMING
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8G

Comparando EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti HYBRID GAMING vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8G

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2015

Comparación de la tarjeta de video EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti HYBRID GAMING con la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8G por especificaciones y puntos de referencia. EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti HYBRID GAMING funciona a 1.140 GHz+ 14 % velocidad de reloj base y tiene 6 GB de GDDR5 memoria, mientras que la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8G funciona a 1.140 GHz+ 14 % velocidad de reloj base y tiene 8 GB de GDDR6 de memoria. El peso es diferente, -- frente a --. El TDP de la primera tarjeta de video es 250 W, y el segundo es 250 W . Compare los resultados de referencia para averiguar qué tarjeta de video es mejor.

Differences
Reasons to consider
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti HYBRID GAMING
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8G
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.650 GHz left arrow 1.140 GHz+ 14 %
    Around 31% better clock speed
  • More memory
    8 GB left arrow 6 GB
    25% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti HYBRID GAMING vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8G
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti HYBRID GAMING EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti HYBRID GAMING
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8G
GPU

gpu EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti HYBRID GAMING item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti left arrow NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
  • GPU Chip
    GM200-310-A1 (Maxwell 2.0) left arrow TU104
  • Execution units
    22 left arrow 48
  • Shader
    2816 left arrow 3072
  • Render Output Units
    96 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    176 left arrow 192
Memory
  • Memory Size
    6 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    7.01 Gbps left arrow 1.938 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    337 GB/s left arrow 496 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    384 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.140 GHz+ 14 % left arrow 1.650 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.228 GHz+ 14 % left arrow 1.860 GHz+ 2 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.815 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 280 W
  • Tjunction max
    92 \xc2\xb0C left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Radial / Axial (Radiator) left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 65 mm left arrow 3 x 100 mm
  • Fan 2
    1 x 120 mm left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    [[cooler_type_5]] left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow 43 dB
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0 left arrow 3x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.2 left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    4096x2160 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow GIGABYTE RGB Fusion
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    267 mm left arrow 290 mm
  • Height
    111 mm left arrow 134 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 60 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2015 left arrow Q3/2019
  • Structure size
    28 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    06G-P4-1996-KR left arrow GV-N208SAORUS-8GC
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons