Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G

Comparando Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G

Comparación de la tarjeta de video Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V con la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G por especificaciones y puntos de referencia. Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V funciona a 1.350 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 11 GB de GDDR6 memoria, mientras que la tarjeta de video GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G funciona a 1.350 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 8 GB de GDDR6 de memoria. El peso es diferente, 1400 g frente a --. El TDP de la primera tarjeta de video es 250 W, y el segundo es 250 W . Compare los resultados de referencia para averiguar qué tarjeta de video es mejor.

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G
Differences
Reasons to consider
Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V
Report a bug
  • More memory
    11 GB left arrow 8 GB
    27% more memory
Reasons to consider
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.650 GHz left arrow 1.350 GHz
    Around 18% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce WB 8G
GPU

gpu Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti left arrow NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
  • GPU Chip
    TU102 left arrow TU104
  • Execution units
    68 left arrow 48
  • Shader
    4352 left arrow 3072
  • Render Output Units
    88 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    272 left arrow 192
Memory
  • Memory Size
    11 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    1.75 GHz left arrow 1.938 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    616 GB/s left arrow 496 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    352 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.350 GHz left arrow 1.650 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.770 GHz+ 15 % left arrow 1.860 GHz+ 2 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.815 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 280 W
  • PCIe-Power
    3 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Water cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 90 mm left arrow --
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    1 x 80 mm left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow 0 dB
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 3x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • USB-C Ports
    1 left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • LED
    iGame Energy Core left arrow GIGABYTE RGB Fusion
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    318 mm left arrow 291 mm
  • Height
    147 mm left arrow 159 mm
  • Width
    59 mm left arrow 29 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    1400 g left arrow --
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2018 left arrow Q3/2019
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 949 $
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow GV-N208SAORUS WB-8GC
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons