Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASUS ROG Matrix GeForce GTX 980 Ti Platinum
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti CLASSIFIED GAMING ACX 2.0+ V3

Comparando ASUS ROG Matrix GeForce GTX 980 Ti Platinum vs EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti CLASSIFIED GAMING ACX 2.0+ V3

Comparación de la tarjeta de video ASUS ROG Matrix GeForce GTX 980 Ti Platinum con la tarjeta de video EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti CLASSIFIED GAMING ACX 2.0+ V3 por especificaciones y puntos de referencia. ASUS ROG Matrix GeForce GTX 980 Ti Platinum funciona a 1.216 GHz+ 22 % velocidad de reloj base y tiene 6 GB de GDDR5 memoria, mientras que la tarjeta de video EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti CLASSIFIED GAMING ACX 2.0+ V3 funciona a 1.216 GHz+ 22 % velocidad de reloj base y tiene 6 GB de GDDR5 de memoria. El peso es diferente, -- frente a --. El TDP de la primera tarjeta de video es 250 W, y el segundo es 250 W . Compare los resultados de referencia para averiguar qué tarjeta de video es mejor.

EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti CLASSIFIED GAMING ACX 2.0+ V3
Differences
Reasons to consider
ASUS ROG Matrix GeForce GTX 980 Ti Platinum
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.216 GHz+ 22 % left arrow 1.190 GHz+ 19 %
    Around 2% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti CLASSIFIED GAMING ACX 2.0+ V3
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests ASUS ROG Matrix GeForce GTX 980 Ti Platinum vs EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti CLASSIFIED GAMING ACX 2.0+ V3
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
ASUS ROG Matrix GeForce GTX 980 Ti Platinum ASUS ROG Matrix GeForce GTX 980 Ti Platinum
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti CLASSIFIED GAMING ACX 2.0+ V3 EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti CLASSIFIED GAMING ACX 2.0+ V3
GPU

gpu ASUS ROG Matrix GeForce GTX 980 Ti Platinum item

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    GM200-310-A1 (Maxwell 2.0) left arrow GM200-310-A1 (Maxwell 2.0)
  • Execution units
    22 left arrow 22
  • Shader
    2816 left arrow 2816
  • Render Output Units
    96 left arrow 96
  • Texture Units
    176 left arrow 176
Memory
  • Memory Size
    6 GB left arrow 6 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Clock
    1.800 GHz left arrow 1.753 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    7.2 Gbps left arrow 7.01 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    346 GB/s left arrow 337 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    384 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    1.216 GHz+ 22 % left arrow 1.190 GHz+ 19 %
  • Boost Clock
    1.317 GHz+ 22 % left arrow 1.291 GHz+ 20 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • Tjunction max
    92 \xc2\xb0C left arrow 92 \xc2\xb0C
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    2 x 100 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.2 left arrow 3x DP v1.2
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    4096x2160 left arrow 4096x2160
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    Addressable LED left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    295 mm left arrow 279 mm
  • Height
    138 mm left arrow 151 mm
  • Width
    51 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3 x 16
  • Release date
    Q4/2015 left arrow Q1/2016
  • Launch Price
    849 $ left arrow 649 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    28 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Part-no
    MATRIX-GTX980TI-P-6GD5-GAMING left arrow 06G-P4-4998-KR
  • Documents
    -- left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons