Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6750 XT OC Edition
Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti Phoenix GS

Comparando ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6750 XT OC Edition vs Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti Phoenix GS

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2022

Comparación de la tarjeta de video ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6750 XT OC Edition con la tarjeta de video Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti Phoenix GS por especificaciones y puntos de referencia. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6750 XT OC Edition funciona a 2.200 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 12 GB de GDDR6 memoria, mientras que la tarjeta de video Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti Phoenix GS funciona a 2.200 GHz velocidad de reloj base y tiene 6 GB de GDDR5 de memoria. El peso es diferente, -- frente a --. El TDP de la primera tarjeta de video es 250 W, y el segundo es 250 W . Compare los resultados de referencia para averiguar qué tarjeta de video es mejor.

Differences
Reasons to consider
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6750 XT OC Edition
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.200 GHz left arrow 1.241 GHz+ 24 %
    Around 44% better clock speed
  • More memory
    12 GB left arrow 6 GB
    50% more memory
Reasons to consider
Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti Phoenix GS
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6750 XT OC Edition vs Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti Phoenix GS
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6750 XT OC Edition ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6750 XT OC Edition
Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti Phoenix GS Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti Phoenix GS
GPU

gpu ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6750 XT OC Edition item

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 22 KXT (RDNA 2) left arrow GM200-310-A1 (Maxwell 2.0)
  • Execution units
    40 left arrow 22
  • Shader
    2560 left arrow 2816
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 96
  • Texture Units
    160 left arrow 176
  • Raytracing Cores
    40 left arrow 0
Memory
  • Memory Size
    12 GB left arrow 6 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Clock
    2.250 GHz left arrow 1.753 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    18 Gbps left arrow 7.01 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    432 GB/s left arrow 337 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    192 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock Speeds
  • Base Clock
    2.200 GHz left arrow 1.241 GHz+ 24 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.618 GHz+ 1 % left arrow 1.152 GHz+ 7 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.512 GHz+ 1 % left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design
  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 92 \xc2\xb0C
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    2 x 100 mm left arrow 3 x 80 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
Connectivity
  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.2
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Featureset
  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 4096x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
Dimensions
  • Length
    295 mm left arrow 292 mm
  • Height
    139 mm left arrow 112 mm
  • Width
    55 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data
  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2022 left arrow Q2/2015
  • Launch Price
    549 $ (Reference) left arrow 649 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow 426018336-3477
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons