Intel Xeon W-3265M
Select processor 2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon W-3265M - specifications and benchmarks

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
Intel Xeon W-3265M

Intel Xeon W-3265M

The Intel Xeon W-3265M technical specifications and performance benchmarks are detailed on this page. The release date is Q2/2019. Intel Xeon W-3265M supports the installation of LGA 3647 socket on the motherboard. The number of cores is 24 with the base clock speed of 2.70 GHz. Maximum capacity and type of RAM supported are DDR4-2933. TDP is 205 W.
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
CPU generation and family

description Intel Xeon W-3265M

  • Name
    Intel Xeon W-3265M
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon W
  • Generation
    7
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon W-2200/3200
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

  • Frequency
    2.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    24
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.60 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    48
  • Turbo (24 Cores)
    3.60 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes
  • Overclocking
    No
  • Core architecture
    normal
Internal Graphics

  • GPU name
    no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo
Hardware codec support

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No
  • h264
    No
  • VP9
    No
  • VP8
    No
  • AV1
    No
  • AVC
    No
  • VC-1
    No
  • JPEG
    No
Memory & PCIe

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933
  • Max. Memory
    2048 GB
  • ECC
    Yes
  • Memory channels
    6
  • PCIe version
    3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    64
Encryption

  • AES-NI
    Yes
Thermal Management

  • TDP (PL1)
    205 W
Technical details

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    33.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cascade Lake W
  • Technology
    14 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 3647
  • Release date
    Q2/2019
Devices using this processor

  • Used in
    Apple Mac Pro (2019)
Rate the processor
Intel Xeon W-3265M
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons