HiSilicon Kirin 910T
Select processor 2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 910T - specifications and benchmarks

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2014
HiSilicon Kirin 910T

HiSilicon Kirin 910T

The HiSilicon Kirin 910T technical specifications and performance benchmarks are detailed on this page. The release date is Q1/2014. HiSilicon Kirin 910T supports the installation of N/A socket on the motherboard. The number of cores is 4 with the base clock speed of 1.80 GHz. Maximum capacity and type of RAM supported are LPDDR3. TDP is .
Performance tests
Real tests HiSilicon Kirin 910T
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
CPU generation and family

description HiSilicon Kirin 910T

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 910T
  • Segment
    Mobile
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin
  • Generation
    1
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 910
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

  • Frequency
    1.80 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    1.80 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    1.80 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No
  • Overclocking
    No
  • Core architecture
    normal
Internal Graphics

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-450 MP4
  • GPU frequency
    0.70 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.70 GHz
  • Execution units
    4
  • Shader
    64
  • Max. displays
    1
  • Generation
    Utgard
  • Technology
    28nm
  • Release date
    2012
Hardware codec support

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No
  • h264
    No
  • VP9
    No
  • VP8
    No
  • AV1
    No
  • AVC
    No
  • VC-1
    No
  • JPEG
    No
Memory & PCIe

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3
  • ECC
    No
  • Memory channels
    1
Encryption

  • AES-NI
    No
Thermal Management

Technical details

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A9
  • Technology
    28 nm
  • Socket
    N/A
  • Release date
    Q1/2014
Devices using this processor

  • Used in
    Unknown
Rate the processor
HiSilicon Kirin 910T
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons