AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Select processor 2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 - specifications and benchmarks

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2019
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 technical specifications and performance benchmarks are detailed on this page. The release date is Q3/2019. AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 supports the installation of AM4 socket on the motherboard. The number of cores is 12 with the base clock speed of 3.10 GHz. Maximum capacity and type of RAM supported are DDR4-3200. TDP is 65 W.
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
CPU generation and family

description AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

  • Name
    AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    3
  • CPU group
    AMD Ryzen 3000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

  • Frequency
    3.10 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    12
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    24
  • Turbo (12 Cores)
    No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes
  • Overclocking
    Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal
Internal Graphics

  • GPU name
    no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo
Hardware codec support

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No
  • h264
    No
  • VP9
    No
  • VP8
    No
  • AV1
    No
  • AVC
    No
  • VC-1
    No
  • JPEG
    No
Memory & PCIe

  • Memory type
    DDR4-3200
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB
  • ECC
    No
  • Memory channels
    2
  • PCIe version
    4.0
  • PCIe lanes
    20
Encryption

  • AES-NI
    Yes
Thermal Management

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W
  • Tjunction max.
    95 °C
Technical details

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    64.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Matisse (Zen 2)
  • Technology
    7 nm
  • Socket
    AM4
  • Release date
    Q3/2019
Devices using this processor

  • Used in
    Unknown
Rate the processor
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons