AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Select processor 2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Athlon II X4 760K - specifications and benchmarks

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2013
AMD Athlon II X4 760K

AMD Athlon II X4 760K

The AMD Athlon II X4 760K technical specifications and performance benchmarks are detailed on this page. The release date is Q2/2013. AMD Athlon II X4 760K supports the installation of FM2 socket on the motherboard. The number of cores is 4 with the base clock speed of 3.80 GHz. Maximum capacity and type of RAM supported are DDR3-1866. TDP is 100 W.
Performance tests
Real tests AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
CPU generation and family

description AMD Athlon II X4 760K

  • Name
    AMD Athlon II X4 760K
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Athlon II
  • Generation
    1
  • CPU group
    AMD Athlon II (Richland)
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

  • Frequency
    3.80 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.10 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    4.10 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No
  • Overclocking
    Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal
Internal Graphics

  • GPU name
    no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo
Hardware codec support

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No
  • h264
    No
  • VP9
    No
  • VP8
    No
  • AV1
    No
  • AVC
    No
  • VC-1
    No
  • JPEG
    No
Memory & PCIe

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    No
  • Memory channels
    1
Encryption

  • AES-NI
    No
Thermal Management

  • TDP (PL1)
    100 W
Technical details

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Richland
  • Technology
    32 nm
  • Socket
    FM2
  • Release date
    Q2/2013
Devices using this processor

  • Used in
    Unknown
Rate the processor
AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons