Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Apple A12Z Bionic
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Comparing Apple A12Z Bionic vs Apple A12Z Bionic

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2019
Released
Q1/2020
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparison of video cards. Apple A12Z Bionic vs Apple A12Z Bionic in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.80 GHz left arrow 1.59 GHz
    Around -13% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    2.84 GHz left arrow 2.49 GHz
    Around 12% better overclocked clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    10 W left arrow 15 W
    About 1.5 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
Apple A12Z Bionic
Report a bug
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Apple A12Z Bionic Apple A12Z Bionic
CPU generation and family

description_compare Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and Apple A12Z Bionic

  • Name
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 left arrow Apple A12Z Bionic
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Qualcomm Snapdragon left arrow Apple A series
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 12
  • CPU group
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 865/870 left arrow Apple A12/A12X/A12Z
  • Predecessor
    -- left arrow Apple A10X Fusion
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

  • Frequency
    1.80 GHz left arrow 1.59 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.84 GHz left arrow 2.49 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (8 Cores)
    2.42 GHz left arrow 2.49 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A core
    1x Kryo 585 Prime left arrow 4x Vortex
  • B core
    3x Kryo 585 Gold left arrow 4x Tempest
  • C core
    4x Kryo 585 Silver left arrow --
Internal Graphics
  • GPU name
    Qualcomm Adreno 650 left arrow Apple A12Z
  • GPU frequency
    0.25 GHz left arrow 1.59 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.59 GHz left arrow 2.49 GHz
  • Execution units
    2 left arrow 8
  • Shader
    512 left arrow 0
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 6 GB
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 9
  • DirectX Version
    12.0 left arrow --
  • Technology
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2019 left arrow Q1/2020
Hardware codec support
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe
  • Memory type
    LPDDR4X-4266 left arrow LPDDR4X-4266
  • Max. Memory
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management
  • TDP (PL1)
    10 W left arrow 15 W
Technical details
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • L2-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    3.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    Kryo 585 left arrow A12
  • Technology
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q4/2019 left arrow Q1/2020
  • Part Number
    SM8250 left arrow --
Devices using this processor
  • Used in
    OnePlus 8OnePlus 8 ProSamsung Galaxy S20 5GSamsung Galaxy S20+ 5GSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G left arrow Apple iPad Pro 2020
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons